Безплатна доставка със Еконт над 129 лв
Speedy office 11.00 лв Speedy 13.00 лв ЕКОНТ 6.00 лв Еконтомат/Офис на Еконт 6.00 лв Box Now 6.00 лв

Let Me Be a Refugee

Език Английски езикАнглийски език
Книга С меки корици
Книга Let Me Be a Refugee Rebecca Hamlin
Код Либристо: 04532368
Издателство Oxford University Press Inc, октомври 2014
Why do decision-makers in similar liberal democracies interpret the same legal definition in very di... Цялото описание
? points 168 b
131.33 лв
Външен склад Изпращаме след 19-25 дни

30 дни за връщане на стоката


Може би ще Ви заинтересува


Narconomics Tom Wainwright / С меки корици
common.buy 33.88 лв
Taekwondo perfekt. Bd.2 Kim Chul-Hwan / С меки корици
common.buy 32.37 лв
Falize Katherine Purcell / С твърди корици
common.buy 240.57 лв
Facility Manager's Guide to Environmental Health and Safety Brian J. Gallant / С меки корици
common.buy 332.77 лв
Leben des Quintus Fixlein Jean Paul / С меки корици
common.buy 83.01 лв

Why do decision-makers in similar liberal democracies interpret the same legal definition in very different ways? International law provides states with a common definition of a 'refugee' as well as guidelines outlining how asylum claims should be decided. Yet, the processes by which countries determine who should be granted refugee status look strikingly different, even across nations with many political, cultural, geographical, and institutional commonalities. This book compares the refugee status determination (RSD) regimes of three popular asylum seeker destinations - the United States, Canada, and Australia. Despite similarly high levels of political resistance to accepting asylum seekers across these three states, once asylum seekers cross their borders, they access three very different systems. These differences are significant both in terms of asylum seekers' experience of the process and in terms of their likelihood of being found to be a refugee. The book moves beyond the claim by some scholars that asylum seeker destinations are uniformly becoming more exclusionary, and the contrary assertions of other scholars that the same destinations are converging on a new inclusive internationalism leading to the decline of state sovereignty. Instead, I find these states to be running on three distinct trajectories, none of which are totally restrictive or expansive. Based on a multi-method analysis of all three countries, including a year of fieldwork with in-depth interviews of policy-makers and asylum-seeker advocates, observations of refugee status determination hearings, and a large-scale case analysis, I find that cross-national differences have less to do with political debates over admission and border control policy than with the level of insulation the administrative decision-making agency enjoys from either political interference or judicial review. Administrative justice is conceptualized and organized differently in every state, and so states vary in how they draw the line between refugee and non-refugee.

Подарете тази книга днес
Лесно е
1 Добавете книгата в количката си и изберете Доставка като подарък 2 В замяна ще ви изпратим ваучер 3 Книгата ще пристигне на адреса на получателя

Вход

Влезте в акаунта си. Още нямате акаунт за Libristo? Създайте го сега!

 
задължително
задължително

Нямате акаунт? Използвайте предимствата на акаунта за Libristo!

Благодарение на акаунта за Libristo държите всичко под контрол.

Създаване на акаунт за Libristo